Post by messi23 on Mar 12, 2024 10:24:50 GMT
Charging different prices for men and women is not an abusive practice decided federal judge paulo cezar duran from the th federal civil court of são paulo. For him the measure is part of free competition and serves as a way of including women in social life. Reproduction the practice of charging women cheaper tickets is common at parties. Reproduction in a preliminary decision the judge determined that the union should stop applying the technical note that provides for the illegality of differentiating prices between men and women until a final decision is made. The decision is valid until the merits are judged and only for establishments associated with the brazilian association of bars and restaurants – são paulo section.
Technical note published by the ministry of justice Germany Phone Number states that differentiating prices between men and women is an abusive commercial practice affronts the principles of human dignity and equality and uses women as a marketing strategy that places them in a situation of inferiority. In the association's opinion by issuing such a normative act the union abuses interventionism in the private sector creating increasing embarrassment for economic activity and generating costs and legal uncertainty for those dedicated to investing in the sector. For paulo cezar duran there is no abusiveness on the part of individual entrepreneurs in charging different prices for men and women.
He believes it is not plausible that a technical note strictly based on presumptions will prevent free competition and free enterprise from exercising their role in the market. I do not see the issue of price differentiation as a marketing strategy to the point of devaluing women and reducing them to the status of objects nor of inferiority. It is known that in our society unfortunately women still often find themselves in an unequal position in relation to men such as salary working hours and active voice in society. … in this social reality the price differentiation practiced by establishments may have as its objective the possibility of greater participation of women in the social environment understands the judge.
Technical note published by the ministry of justice Germany Phone Number states that differentiating prices between men and women is an abusive commercial practice affronts the principles of human dignity and equality and uses women as a marketing strategy that places them in a situation of inferiority. In the association's opinion by issuing such a normative act the union abuses interventionism in the private sector creating increasing embarrassment for economic activity and generating costs and legal uncertainty for those dedicated to investing in the sector. For paulo cezar duran there is no abusiveness on the part of individual entrepreneurs in charging different prices for men and women.
He believes it is not plausible that a technical note strictly based on presumptions will prevent free competition and free enterprise from exercising their role in the market. I do not see the issue of price differentiation as a marketing strategy to the point of devaluing women and reducing them to the status of objects nor of inferiority. It is known that in our society unfortunately women still often find themselves in an unequal position in relation to men such as salary working hours and active voice in society. … in this social reality the price differentiation practiced by establishments may have as its objective the possibility of greater participation of women in the social environment understands the judge.